Posts Tagged ‘California Restraining Order’

Mel Gibson Taped Comments and Possible Child Custody Implications

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

Mel Gibson and his now infamous comments recorded by his ex-girlfriend Oksana Grigorieva may have a detrimental impact in a family law court if a child custody dispute arises. In the conversation, Grigorieva states that Gibson punched her resulting in a loss of teeth. Gibson allegedly responded by saying she “deserved it.”

Many spouses attempt to set up their former spouses to gain an advantage in a child custody dispute. In a child custody dispute, the court can determine the parents’ custody and visitation rights. The court will base its decision on what is in the best interest of the child. Committing domestic violence is detrimental to the child’s best interest. The court will not look favorably to a parent who commits domestic violence. The court can use any evidence of domestic violence occurring in making their decision.

Under California Family Code Section 3044, if the court finds that a party seeking custody of a child has perpetrated domestic violence against the other party seeking custody of the child within the previous five years, there is a rebuttable presumption that an award of sole or joint physical or legal custody of a child to a person who has perpetrated domestic violence is detrimental to the best interest of the child. Based upon this section, Mel Gibson could be denied of having physical custody of his daughter.

If you or a loved one is involved in a child custody dispute, it is important that you speak with an experienced child custody attorney. At Wallin & Klarich, our Southern California child custody attorneys have over 30 years of experience in handling child custody cases. We will aggressively fight to get the best result for you and your child. Call us today at (888) 280-6839.

Sandra Bullock: Divorce Pending – California Family Code Section 2310

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

The LA Times recently reported on Sandra Bullock’s first public appearance since the Oscars at the Spike TV’s Guy’s Choice Awards. Ms. Bullock was not wearing her wedding ring as divorce proceedings between herself and Jesse James are currently underway. Jesse James was caught in a cheating scandal immediately following Bullock’s Best Actress win at [...]

Read Full Article

Facebook: Divorce Attorney’s New Ally – California Family Code § 2310

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

Facebook, an internet networking website, is a new tool used by divorce attorneys to aid their client. Because California operates under the no-fault rule, information gathered through Facebook would not be used to show that one spouse has violated their marital contract; but rather, the information would primarily be used to discredit the other spouse’s [...]

Read Full Article

“Buffy the Vampire Slayer” star Emma Caulfield wants a divorce from her husband, Cornelius Grobbelaar – California Family Code section 2330 and 2310.

Monday, May 24th, 2010

It was recently reported in Examiner.com that actress Emma Caulfield is seeking a divorce from long time husband Cornelius Grobbelaar. Caulfield wants a divorce after the couple was married for almost four years. Caulfield began the divorce process by filing necessary divorce documents in the Los Angeles Superior Court citing “irreconcilable differences.” Under California Family [...]

Read Full Article

Gossip Girl Kelly Rutherford Obtained a Temporary Restraining Order against Estranged Husband

Monday, October 19th, 2009

Kelly Rutherford and her estranged husband, Giersch, have been involved in a custody battle over their two children. It is reported that Rutherford alleges that Giersch has been randomly showing up and threatening her, her mother and her nanny and scaring them, so much so that the nanny became upset and quit. Media reports indicate [...]

Read Full Article

Restraining Orders Ineffective at Combating Cyberstalking

Monday, August 24th, 2009

An article on examiner.com discusses the plight of victims with California domestic violence restraining orders that are finding that those restraining order documents are doing little in preventing their stalkers from tracking and harassing them online. By targeting blogs and social networking sites, these restrainees are able to continue to harass their victims, with little [...]

Read Full Article